SKN3X.COM

DataDeFi Navigator

SKN3X.COM
  • Intelligence
  • Strategy Intelligence Report
    • What is DeFi?
    • DeFi Academy
    • Analysis Academy
    • Glossary
    • DeFi Finder
    • DeFi Navigator
    • DeFi Explorer
    • DeFi Terminal
    • Assets
    • Chains
    • Protocols
    • Analysis framework
    • Metrics framework
    • Research
    • Methodology
    • About

SKN3X.COMDescribed, not rated.

DeFi data is volatile and can change at any time. This presentation does not constitute investment, legal, or tax advice. DeFi applications can carry significant risks, including the total loss of deposited assets.

HomeStrategy Intelligence ReportWhat is DeFi?DeFi AcademyDeFi FinderDeFi NavigatorDeFi ExplorerDeFi TerminalAssetsChainsProtocolsGlossaryMethodologyLegal NoticePrivacyMy dataAboutContact

Copyright © 2026 Tobias Licht. All rights reserved.

1,894meet allAll markets · 7,066Stablecoin markets only · 1,894

SUSDS · Sky Lending

Vaults & Savings · Ethereum

APY

3.60%

TVL

$4.78B

✓ meets the criterion

SUSDS · Sky Lending

Vaults & Savings · Ethereum

APY

3.60%

TVL

$4.78B

✓ meets the criterion

SUSDS · Sky Lending, Vaults & Savings · Ethereum, APY 3.60%, TVL $4.78B

DeFi Navigator · Narrow down instead of searching

Where should I look?

  • Stable yield
  • Large market
  • No incentives
  • RWA
0 %
0 %20 %
any
$100K$1B
100 %
0 %100 %
▾▾
Exclude data flags▾
Exclude data flags
1,894meet all0not checkable6,372excluded
Open 1,894 markets →Compare (0)

meets allnot checkableexcludedShape + color · no rating · schematic

Sliders with ← → · Tab moves to the next criterion

  1. DeFi Navigator
  2. /All market types
  3. /Stablecoins
  1. 1. Objective
  2. ›2. Criteria
  3. ›3. Comparison

1,894 candidates

Checked against your criteria. “Not determinable” means the source does not supply the value — it is not estimated.

Export
Open in Explorer

Active criteria

  • Stablecoin markets only

Define your search

2 active criteria

Only criteria the data can evaluate. A criterion that cannot be checked for a market is reported as “not determinable” — never as passed or failed.

Market scope
Yield
Size & liquidity

Position size is not stored and produces no suitability statement.

The minimum TVL compares the source's TVL – for lending markets, supply minus borrowing, as in Explorer, Finder and Terminal. The Navigator searches every market from 100,000 $ TVL; Explorer, Finder and Terminal start at 1 M $.

Data quality & flags
Exclude markets where these flags triggered
Reset

Stored in this browser only. No account, nothing sent to the server.

Result list

8 266
Universe

Every market here passes every active criterion. That is a criteria match, not a recommendation.

Data as of Oct 5, 2026, 6:53 PM UTC · DeFiLlama

Show
  • Matches all criteria 1 894
  • Not fully determinable 0
  • Excluded 6 372
Sort by
  • TVL
  • APY
  • Available liquidity
  • Utilization
Direction
  • Descending
  • Ascending
Density
  • Cards
  • Compact

The link reproduces exactly these criteria, sorting and selection. It contains no personal data.

  1. SUSDSVaults & Savings

    Sky Lending · Chain: Ethereum

    Compare
    3.60%
    3.60%
    $4.78B
    ✓Matches 2 of 2 criteria
    ›Why this market appears
    • ✓Stablecoin market · passed
    • ✓Not a statistical outlier · passed
    3.60%
    591

    Not reported: Reward APY

    ›Data flags · 5 of 13 dimensions assessed
    Total flag points0 flags · 0 points

    The flag points are an internal, unvalidated heuristic over public DeFiLlama fields — not an audit, not a rating. Not assessed: smart contracts, oracles, governance, bridges, counterparty, custody, regulation. Methodology

    Smart Contract Risk
    Not assessed
    Protocol Risk
    0 of 1 points
    Chain maturity
    0 of 2 points
    Market Risk
    0 of 4 points
    Liquidity Risk
    0 of 3 points
    Oracle Risk
    Not assessed
    Governance Risk
    Not assessed
    Counterparty
    Not assessed
    Custody
    Not assessed
    Stablecoin Risk
    Not assessed
    Bridge Risk
    Not assessed
    Regulatory Risk
    Not assessed
    Data Quality
    0 of 3 points
    Regulatory status
    Not assessed — this service makes no legal determination.
    Source
    —
    ›Analysis coverage · 4 of 12 dimensions with data

    Which of the twelve Analysis Framework dimensions this system can back with data for this market. “Data” means a field exists — not that the dimension is assessed favorably. Every row leads to the method.

    1. 01Market●Data available
    2. 02Business Model●Data available
    3. 03Technology●Data available
    4. 04Smart Contracts—Not captured
    5. 05Tokenomics—Not captured
    6. 06Liquidity○Heuristic only
    7. 07Economics—Not captured
    8. 08Governance—Not captured
    9. 09Security○Heuristic only
    10. 10Dependencies◐Partially captured
    11. 11Regulation—Not captured
    12. 12Institutional Impact—Not captured
    How this market is built›
    ExploreDetail & evidenceAnalyze
  2. USDCTokenized RWA

    Maple · Chain: Ethereum · Syrup USDC

    Compare
    5.12%
    5.07%
    $2.91B
    5.12%
    ✓Matches 2 of 2 criteria
    ›Why this market appears
    • ✓Stablecoin market · passed
    • ✓Not a statistical outlier · passed
    0.00%
    434

    Not reported: Market capitalization, Yield source

    ›Data flags · 4 of 13 dimensions assessed
    Total flag points0 flags · 0 points

    The flag points are an internal, unvalidated heuristic over public DeFiLlama fields — not an audit, not a rating. Not assessed: smart contracts, oracles, governance, bridges, counterparty, custody, regulation. Methodology

    Smart Contract Risk
    Not assessed
    Protocol Risk
    Not assessed
    Chain maturity
    0 of 2 points
    Market Risk
    0 of 4 points
    Liquidity Risk
    0 of 3 points
    Oracle Risk
    Not assessed
    Governance Risk
    Not assessed
    Counterparty
    Not assessed
    Custody
    Not assessed
    Stablecoin Risk
    Not assessed
    Bridge Risk
    Not assessed
    Regulatory Risk
    Not assessed
    Data Quality
    0 of 3 points
    Regulatory status
    Not assessed — this service makes no legal determination.
    Source
    —
    ›Analysis coverage · 4 of 12 dimensions with data

    Which of the twelve Analysis Framework dimensions this system can back with data for this market. “Data” means a field exists — not that the dimension is assessed favorably. Every row leads to the method.

    1. 01Market●Data available
    2. 02Business Model●Data available
    3. 03Technology●Data available
    4. 04Smart Contracts—Not captured
    5. 05Tokenomics—Not captured
    6. 06Liquidity○Heuristic only
    7. 07Economics—Not captured
    8. 08Governance—Not captured
    9. 09Security○Heuristic only
    10. 10Dependencies◐Partially captured
    11. 11Regulation—Not captured
    12. 12Institutional Impact—Not captured
    How this market is built›
    ExploreDetail & evidenceAnalyze
  3. USYCTokenized RWA

    Circle USYC · Chain: BSC

    Compare
    3.41%
    3.21%
    $2.36B
    3.41%
    ✓Matches 2 of 2 criteria
    ›Why this market appears
    • ✓Stablecoin market · passed
    • ✓Not a statistical outlier · passed
    185

    Not reported: Market capitalization, Reward APY, Yield source

    ›Data flags · 4 of 13 dimensions assessed
    Total flag points0 flags · 0 points

    The flag points are an internal, unvalidated heuristic over public DeFiLlama fields — not an audit, not a rating. Not assessed: smart contracts, oracles, governance, bridges, counterparty, custody, regulation. Methodology

    Smart Contract Risk
    Not assessed
    Protocol Risk
    Not assessed
    Chain maturity
    0 of 2 points
    Market Risk
    0 of 4 points
    Liquidity Risk
    0 of 3 points
    Oracle Risk
    Not assessed
    Governance Risk
    Not assessed
    Counterparty
    Not assessed
    Custody
    Not assessed
    Stablecoin Risk
    Not assessed
    Bridge Risk
    Not assessed
    Regulatory Risk
    Not assessed
    Data Quality
    0 of 3 points
    Regulatory status
    Not assessed — this service makes no legal determination.
    Source
    —
    ›Analysis coverage · 4 of 12 dimensions with data

    Which of the twelve Analysis Framework dimensions this system can back with data for this market. “Data” means a field exists — not that the dimension is assessed favorably. Every row leads to the method.

    1. 01Market●Data available
    2. 02Business Model●Data available
    3. 03Technology●Data available
    4. 04Smart Contracts—Not captured
    5. 05Tokenomics—Not captured
    6. 06Liquidity○Heuristic only
    7. 07Economics—Not captured
    8. 08Governance—Not captured
    9. 09Security○Heuristic only
    10. 10Dependencies◐Partially captured
    11. 11Regulation—Not captured
    12. 12Institutional Impact—Not captured
    How this market is built›
    ExploreDetail & evidenceAnalyze
  4. SUSDEVaults & Savings

    Ethena USDe · Chain: Ethereum · 7 days unstaking

    Compare
    4.96%
    4.89%
    $1.24B
    ✓Matches 2 of 2 criteria
    ›Why this market appears
    • ✓Stablecoin market · passed
    • ✓Not a statistical outlier · passed
    4.96%
    960

    Not reported: Reward APY

    ›Data flags · 5 of 13 dimensions assessed
    Total flag points1 flag · 1 point

    The flag points are an internal, unvalidated heuristic over public DeFiLlama fields — not an audit, not a rating. Not assessed: smart contracts, oracles, governance, bridges, counterparty, custody, regulation. Methodology

    Smart Contract Risk
    Not assessed
    Protocol Risk
    1 of 1 points
    Chain maturity
    0 of 2 points
    Market Risk
    0 of 4 points
    Liquidity Risk
    0 of 3 points
    Oracle Risk
    Not assessed
    Governance Risk
    Not assessed
    Counterparty
    Not assessed
    Custody
    Not assessed
    Stablecoin Risk
    Not assessed
    Bridge Risk
    Not assessed
    Regulatory Risk
    Not assessed
    Data Quality
    0 of 3 points
    Regulatory status
    Not assessed — this service makes no legal determination.
    Source
    —
    ›Analysis coverage · 4 of 12 dimensions with data

    Which of the twelve Analysis Framework dimensions this system can back with data for this market. “Data” means a field exists — not that the dimension is assessed favorably. Every row leads to the method.

    1. 01Market●Data available
    2. 02Business Model●Data available
    3. 03Technology●Data available
    4. 04Smart Contracts—Not captured
    5. 05Tokenomics—Not captured
    6. 06Liquidity○Heuristic only
    7. 07Economics—Not captured
    8. 08Governance—Not captured
    9. 09Security○Heuristic only
    10. 10Dependencies◐Partially captured
    11. 11Regulation—Not captured
    12. 12Institutional Impact—Not captured
    How this market is built›
    ExploreDetail & evidenceAnalyze
  5. USDYTokenized RWA

    Ondo Yield Assets · Chain: Ethereum · US Dollar Yield

    Compare
    3.62%
    3.59%
    $1.21B
    3.62%
    ✓Matches 2 of 2 criteria
    ›Why this market appears
    • ✓Stablecoin market · passed
    • ✓Not a statistical outlier · passed
    250

    Not reported: Market capitalization, Reward APY, Yield source

    ›Data flags · 4 of 13 dimensions assessed
    Total flag points0 flags · 0 points

    The flag points are an internal, unvalidated heuristic over public DeFiLlama fields — not an audit, not a rating. Not assessed: smart contracts, oracles, governance, bridges, counterparty, custody, regulation. Methodology

    Smart Contract Risk
    Not assessed
    Protocol Risk
    Not assessed
    Chain maturity
    0 of 2 points
    Market Risk
    0 of 4 points
    Liquidity Risk
    0 of 3 points
    Oracle Risk
    Not assessed
    Governance Risk
    Not assessed
    Counterparty
    Not assessed
    Custody
    Not assessed
    Stablecoin Risk
    Not assessed
    Bridge Risk
    Not assessed
    Regulatory Risk
    Not assessed
    Data Quality
    0 of 3 points
    Regulatory status
    Not assessed — this service makes no legal determination.
    Source
    —
    ›Analysis coverage · 4 of 12 dimensions with data

    Which of the twelve Analysis Framework dimensions this system can back with data for this market. “Data” means a field exists — not that the dimension is assessed favorably. Every row leads to the method.

    1. 01Market●Data available
    2. 02Business Model●Data available
    3. 03Technology●Data available
    4. 04Smart Contracts—Not captured
    5. 05Tokenomics—Not captured
    6. 06Liquidity○Heuristic only
    7. 07Economics—Not captured
    8. 08Governance—Not captured
    9. 09Security○Heuristic only
    10. 10Dependencies◐Partially captured
    11. 11Regulation—Not captured
    12. 12Institutional Impact—Not captured
    How this market is built›
    ExploreDetail & evidenceAnalyze
  6. BUIDLTokenized RWA

    BlackRock BUIDL · Chain: Solana

    Compare
    3.78%
    3.66%
    $968M
    3.78%
    ✓Matches 2 of 2 criteria
    ›Why this market appears
    • ✓Stablecoin market · passed
    • ✓Not a statistical outlier · passed
    192

    Not reported: Market capitalization, Reward APY, Yield source

    ›Data flags · 4 of 13 dimensions assessed
    Total flag points0 flags · 0 points

    The flag points are an internal, unvalidated heuristic over public DeFiLlama fields — not an audit, not a rating. Not assessed: smart contracts, oracles, governance, bridges, counterparty, custody, regulation. Methodology

    Smart Contract Risk
    Not assessed
    Protocol Risk
    Not assessed
    Chain maturity
    0 of 2 points
    Market Risk
    0 of 4 points
    Liquidity Risk
    0 of 3 points
    Oracle Risk
    Not assessed
    Governance Risk
    Not assessed
    Counterparty
    Not assessed
    Custody
    Not assessed
    Stablecoin Risk
    Not assessed
    Bridge Risk
    Not assessed
    Regulatory Risk
    Not assessed
    Data Quality
    0 of 3 points
    Regulatory status
    Not assessed — this service makes no legal determination.
    Source
    —
    ›Analysis coverage · 4 of 12 dimensions with data

    Which of the twelve Analysis Framework dimensions this system can back with data for this market. “Data” means a field exists — not that the dimension is assessed favorably. Every row leads to the method.

    1. 01Market●Data available
    2. 02Business Model●Data available
    3. 03Technology●Data available
    4. 04Smart Contracts—Not captured
    5. 05Tokenomics—Not captured
    6. 06Liquidity○Heuristic only
    7. 07Economics—Not captured
    8. 08Governance—Not captured
    9. 09Security○Heuristic only
    10. 10Dependencies◐Partially captured
    11. 11Regulation—Not captured
    12. 12Institutional Impact—Not captured
    How this market is built›
    ExploreDetail & evidenceAnalyze
  7. BUIDLTokenized RWA

    BlackRock BUIDL · Chain: Aptos

    Compare
    3.47%
    3.35%
    $968M
    3.47%
    ✓Matches 2 of 2 criteria
    ›Why this market appears
    • ✓Stablecoin market · passed
    • ✓Not a statistical outlier · passed
    192

    Not reported: Market capitalization, Reward APY, Yield source

    ›Data flags · 4 of 13 dimensions assessed
    Total flag points1 flag · 2 points

    The flag points are an internal, unvalidated heuristic over public DeFiLlama fields — not an audit, not a rating. Not assessed: smart contracts, oracles, governance, bridges, counterparty, custody, regulation. Methodology

    Smart Contract Risk
    Not assessed
    Protocol Risk
    Not assessed
    Chain maturity
    2 of 2 points
    Market Risk
    0 of 4 points
    Liquidity Risk
    0 of 3 points
    Oracle Risk
    Not assessed
    Governance Risk
    Not assessed
    Counterparty
    Not assessed
    Custody
    Not assessed
    Stablecoin Risk
    Not assessed
    Bridge Risk
    Not assessed
    Regulatory Risk
    Not assessed
    Data Quality
    0 of 3 points
    Regulatory status
    Not assessed — this service makes no legal determination.
    Source
    —
    ›Analysis coverage · 4 of 12 dimensions with data

    Which of the twelve Analysis Framework dimensions this system can back with data for this market. “Data” means a field exists — not that the dimension is assessed favorably. Every row leads to the method.

    1. 01Market●Data available
    2. 02Business Model●Data available
    3. 03Technology●Data available
    4. 04Smart Contracts—Not captured
    5. 05Tokenomics—Not captured
    6. 06Liquidity○Heuristic only
    7. 07Economics—Not captured
    8. 08Governance—Not captured
    9. 09Security○Heuristic only
    10. 10Dependencies◐Partially captured
    11. 11Regulation—Not captured
    12. 12Institutional Impact—Not captured
    How this market is built›
    ExploreDetail & evidenceAnalyze
  8. USDTTokenized RWA

    Maple · Chain: Ethereum · Syrup USDT

    Compare
    5.59%
    4.88%
    $674M
    5.59%
    ✓Matches 2 of 2 criteria
    ›Why this market appears
    • ✓Stablecoin market · passed
    • ✓Not a statistical outlier · passed
    0.00%
    434

    Not reported: Market capitalization, Yield source

    ›Data flags · 4 of 13 dimensions assessed
    Total flag points0 flags · 0 points

    The flag points are an internal, unvalidated heuristic over public DeFiLlama fields — not an audit, not a rating. Not assessed: smart contracts, oracles, governance, bridges, counterparty, custody, regulation. Methodology

    Smart Contract Risk
    Not assessed
    Protocol Risk
    Not assessed
    Chain maturity
    0 of 2 points
    Market Risk
    0 of 4 points
    Liquidity Risk
    0 of 3 points
    Oracle Risk
    Not assessed
    Governance Risk
    Not assessed
    Counterparty
    Not assessed
    Custody
    Not assessed
    Stablecoin Risk
    Not assessed
    Bridge Risk
    Not assessed
    Regulatory Risk
    Not assessed
    Data Quality
    0 of 3 points
    Regulatory status
    Not assessed — this service makes no legal determination.
    Source
    —
    ›Analysis coverage · 4 of 12 dimensions with data

    Which of the twelve Analysis Framework dimensions this system can back with data for this market. “Data” means a field exists — not that the dimension is assessed favorably. Every row leads to the method.

    1. 01Market●Data available
    2. 02Business Model●Data available
    3. 03Technology●Data available
    4. 04Smart Contracts—Not captured
    5. 05Tokenomics—Not captured
    6. 06Liquidity○Heuristic only
    7. 07Economics—Not captured
    8. 08Governance—Not captured
    9. 09Security○Heuristic only
    10. 10Dependencies◐Partially captured
    11. 11Regulation—Not captured
    12. 12Institutional Impact—Not captured
    How this market is built›
    ExploreDetail & evidenceAnalyze
  9. USDSLend & Borrow

    SparkLend · Chain: Ethereum · SPK Farming Pool

    Compare
    5.08%
    4.34%
    $564M
    5.08%
    ✓Matches 2 of 2 criteria
    ›Why this market appears
    • ✓Stablecoin market · passed
    • ✓Not a statistical outlier · passed
    217

    Not reported: Available liquidity, Utilization, Borrow APY, Max. LTV, Base APY

    ›Data flags · 5 of 13 dimensions assessed
    Total flag points2 flags · 3 points

    The flag points are an internal, unvalidated heuristic over public DeFiLlama fields — not an audit, not a rating. Not assessed: smart contracts, oracles, governance, bridges, counterparty, custody, regulation. Methodology

    Smart Contract Risk
    Not assessed
    Protocol Risk
    0 of 1 points
    Chain maturity
    0 of 2 points
    Market Risk
    2 of 4 points
    Liquidity Risk
    0 of 3 points
    Oracle Risk
    Not assessed
    Governance Risk
    Not assessed
    Counterparty
    Not assessed
    Custody
    Not assessed
    Stablecoin Risk
    Not assessed
    Bridge Risk
    Not assessed
    Regulatory Risk
    Not assessed
    Data Quality
    1 of 3 points
    Regulatory status
    Not assessed — this service makes no legal determination.
    Source
    —
    ›Analysis coverage · 4 of 12 dimensions with data

    Which of the twelve Analysis Framework dimensions this system can back with data for this market. “Data” means a field exists — not that the dimension is assessed favorably. Every row leads to the method.

    1. 01Market●Data available
    2. 02Business Model●Data available
    3. 03Technology●Data available
    4. 04Smart Contracts—Not captured
    5. 05Tokenomics—Not captured
    6. 06Liquidity○Heuristic only
    7. 07Economics—Not captured
    8. 08Governance—Not captured
    9. 09Security○Heuristic only
    10. 10Dependencies◐Partially captured
    11. 11Regulation—Not captured
    12. 12Institutional Impact—Not captured
    How this market is built›
    ExploreDetail & evidenceAnalyze
  10. USTBTokenized RWA

    Invesco USTB · Chain: Ethereum

    Compare
    3.45%
    3.52%
    $557M
    3.45%
    ✓Matches 2 of 2 criteria
    ›Why this market appears
    • ✓Stablecoin market · passed
    • ✓Not a statistical outlier · passed
    185

    Not reported: Market capitalization, Reward APY, Yield source

    ›Data flags · 4 of 13 dimensions assessed
    Total flag points0 flags · 0 points

    The flag points are an internal, unvalidated heuristic over public DeFiLlama fields — not an audit, not a rating. Not assessed: smart contracts, oracles, governance, bridges, counterparty, custody, regulation. Methodology

    Smart Contract Risk
    Not assessed
    Protocol Risk
    Not assessed
    Chain maturity
    0 of 2 points
    Market Risk
    0 of 4 points
    Liquidity Risk
    0 of 3 points
    Oracle Risk
    Not assessed
    Governance Risk
    Not assessed
    Counterparty
    Not assessed
    Custody
    Not assessed
    Stablecoin Risk
    Not assessed
    Bridge Risk
    Not assessed
    Regulatory Risk
    Not assessed
    Data Quality
    0 of 3 points
    Regulatory status
    Not assessed — this service makes no legal determination.
    Source
    —
    ›Analysis coverage · 4 of 12 dimensions with data

    Which of the twelve Analysis Framework dimensions this system can back with data for this market. “Data” means a field exists — not that the dimension is assessed favorably. Every row leads to the method.

    1. 01Market●Data available
    2. 02Business Model●Data available
    3. 03Technology●Data available
    4. 04Smart Contracts—Not captured
    5. 05Tokenomics—Not captured
    6. 06Liquidity○Heuristic only
    7. 07Economics—Not captured
    8. 08Governance—Not captured
    9. 09Security○Heuristic only
    10. 10Dependencies◐Partially captured
    11. 11Regulation—Not captured
    12. 12Institutional Impact—Not captured
    How this market is built›
    ExploreDetail & evidenceAnalyze

Page 1 of 190 · markets 1–10 of 1894

PreviousNext

Excluded (6372)

Show all 6372

At least one active criterion fails. The reason is stated on each market.

  1. STETHLiquid Staking

    Lido · Ethereum

    ✕Stablecoin market · not passed

    2.22%APY✕Matches 1 of 2 criteriaDetail & evidence
  2. WBETHLiquid Staking

    Binance staked ETH · Ethereum

    ✕Stablecoin market · not passed

    2.18%APY✕Matches 1 of 2 criteriaDetail & evidence
  3. WEETHLiquid Staking

    ether.fi Stake · Ethereum

    ✕Stablecoin market · not passed

    2.28%APY✕Matches 1 of 2 criteriaDetail & evidence
  4. WEETHLend & Borrow

    Aave V3 · Ethereum

    ✕Stablecoin market · not passed

    0.00%Supply APY✕Matches 1 of 2 criteriaDetail & evidence
  5. WSTETHLend & Borrow

    SparkLend · Ethereum

    ✕Stablecoin market · not passed

    0.00%Supply APY✕Matches 1 of 2 criteriaDetail & evidence
  6. CBBTCLend & Borrow

    Morpho Blue · Base

    ✕Stablecoin market · not passed

    0.00%Supply APY✕Matches 1 of 2 criteriaDetail & evidence

The DeFi Navigator organizes publicly available market data by the criteria you set. A criteria match is neither a recommendation nor a suitability statement. Risk signals are an internal, unvalidated heuristic. Unreported values are never replaced by estimates. No investment, legal or tax advice.