CASE-03 · 15 min
Governance changes a risk parameter
Type of case study: Constructed scenario with invented figures. No real incident, no real protocol.
Scenario
A proposal raises the maximum loan-to-value for a volatile collateral asset from 65 % to 80 %. Quorum is 4 % of circulating supply. Four addresses together hold 31 % of voting power. The timelock between approval and effect is 48 hours.
Data
- Max LTV, before/after
- 65 % → 80 %
- Quorum
- 4 % of circulating supply
- Voting concentration
- 4 addresses = 31 %
- Timelock
- 48 hours
Questions
Which risks does this decision change — and for whom?
How should 31 % voting concentration at a 4 % quorum be read?
Analysis dimensions exercised
Institutional perspectives
Bank · Asset management · Advisory